nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 06, v.45 534-539
超声引导下单极与双极射频热凝治疗中重度膝骨关节炎的效果对比
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目(82471249); 江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20211107)
邮箱(Email): 19533951086@139.com;
DOI: 10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2025.06.005
摘要:

目的 :比较超声引导下单极射频(monopolar radiofrequency, MRF)热凝与双极射频(bipolar radiofrequency,BRF)热凝对中重度膝骨关节炎患者术后12个月疼痛及膝关节功能改善的差异。方法:选择2022年6月—2023年6月于南通大学附属医院疼痛科就诊的中重度膝骨关节炎(Kellgren-LawrenceⅢ~Ⅳ级)患者94例,随机分为MRF组与BRF组,每组47例。两组均在超声引导下对膝内侧上、下神经与膝外侧上神经射频热凝(80℃,90 s)。主要结局为术后1、3、6、12个月VAS评分,西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index,WOMAC)评分,镇痛药物量化表(medication quantification scaleⅢ, MQS-Ⅲ)评分及治疗相关并发症。结果:两组术后各时间点VAS评分,WOMAC评分以及口服镇痛药物用量均小于术前(P<0.05);在治疗后1、3个月时,两组各评分差异无统计学意义;治疗后6个月时,BRF组VAS评分显著低于MRF组(P<0.05);治疗后12个月时,BRF组VAS评分及WOMAC评分显著低于MRF组(P<0.05)。术后两组口服镇痛药物用量均低于术前(P<0.05),BRF组在术后12个月时显著低于MRF组(P<0.05);两组并发症发生情况差异无统计学意义。结论:两种治疗方式均可有效改善膝关节炎患者的疼痛与功能;超声引导下BRF热凝治疗中重度膝骨关节炎的长期效果显著优于MRF,且安全可靠。

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the long-term efficacy of ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency thermocoagulation for alleviating pain and improving knee function in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis at the 12-month follow-up. Methods: A total of 94 patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis(Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ)were enrolled in this study. They were recruited from the Pain Department of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University between June 2022 and June 2023 and subsequently randomly allocated into two groups: a monopolar radiofrequency(MRF)group and a bipolar radiofrequency(BRF) group, with 47 patients in each group. Both groups underwent ultrasound-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation(80 °C, 90 s) targeting the superior genicular nerve, inferior genicular nerve, and superior lateral genicular nerve. The primary outcomes included VAS scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index(WOMAC) scores, analgesic medication quantification scale Ⅲ(MQS-Ⅲ) scores, and treatment-related complications at1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Results: VAS scores, WOMAC scores, and analgesic medication usage in both groups were lower at all postoperative time points compared with preoperative values(P<0.05). At 1 and 3 months after treatment, there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the scores. At 6 months post-treatment, the BRF group showed significantly lower VAS scores than the MRF group(P<0.05). At 12 months post-treatment, both VAS and WOMAC scores in the BRF group were significantly lower than those in the MRF group(P<0.05). Analgesic medication usage in both groups was lower than preoperative levels(P<0.05), with the BRF group showing significantly lower usage than the MRF group at 12 months(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in treatment-related complications between the two groups.Conclusion: Both treatment methods effectively improved pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. These results indicate that for patients with moderate-to-severe knee osteoarthritis, ultrasound-guided BRF offers superior long-term efficacy and a similarly favorable safety profile compared with MRF.

参考文献

[1]SHARMA L. Osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. N Engl J Med, 2021,384(1):51-59.

[2]GIORGINO R, ALBANO D, FUSCO S, et al. Knee osteoarthritis:epidemiology, pathogenesis, and mesenchymal stem cells:what else is new? an update[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2023, 24(7):6405.

[3]JANG S, LEE K, JU J H. Recent updates of diagnosis,pathophysiology, and treatment on osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(5):2619.

[4]HARDENBERG M, SPEKL魪E M, COENEN P, et al. The economic burden of knee and hip osteoarthritis:absenteeism and costs in the Dutch workforce[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022, 23(1):364.

[5]QUINN R H, MURRAY J N, PEZOLD R, et al. Surgical management of osteoarthritis of the knee[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2018, 26(9):e191-e193.

[6]R E KAS-DUDZIAK A, BRZEZIHSKI K, KOTLIHSKA-HASIEC E, et al. A retrospective assessment of the effectiveness of pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of chronic pain caused by advanced knee osteoarthritis[J].Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2024, 56(2):151-159.

[7]陈嘉芳,何龙,林鹏,等.短时程脊髓电刺激与双极脉冲射频治疗带状疱疹后神经痛的临床研究[J].中国疼痛医学杂志, 2024, 30(9):664-670.

[8]杨旭,徐幼苗,董蕊,等.超声引导联合CT扫描下双极射频脉冲调节治疗难治性神经根型颈椎病效果[J].临床军医杂志, 2022, 50(8):855-857, 861.

[9]MAHMOUDIAN A, LOHMANDER L S, MOBASHERI A,et al. Early-stage symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee—time for action[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2021, 17(10):621-632.

[10]KOHN M D, SASSOON A A, FERNANDO N D. Classifications in brief:Kellgren-Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(8):1886-1893.

[11]WU W, BRYANT A L, HINMAN R S, et al. Walking-related knee contact forces and associations with knee pain across people with mild, moderate and severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis:a cross-sectional study[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2022, 30(6):832-842.

[12]WANG Z, XU H, WANG Z, et al. Effects of externallyapplied, non-pharmacological Interventions on short-and long-term symptoms and inflammatory cytokine levels in patients with knee osteoarthritis:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Front Immunol, 2023, 14:1309751.

[13]CHOI W J, HWANG S J, SONG J G, et al. Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain:a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. Pain, 2011, 152(3):481-487.

[14]GULEC E, OZBEK H, PEKTAS S, et al. Bipolar versus unipolar intraarticular pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation in chronic knee pain treatment:a prospective randomized trial[J]. Pain Physician, 2017, 20(3):197-206.

[15]WONG P K, KOKABI N, GUO Y, et al. Safety and efficacy comparison of three-vs four-needle technique in the management of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee using cooled radiofrequency ablation[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2021,50(4):739-750.

[16]王丽娜,彭欣,董珉光,等.高选择性神经射频消融联合富血小板血浆治疗中重度膝骨关节炎的疗效分析[J].中国疼痛医学杂志, 2024, 30(5):384-389.

[17]KIM P Y, COHEN S P. Genicular nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation for knee osteoarthritis:more nerves, more questions[J]. Pain Med, 2021, 22(5):1019-1021.

[18]TRAN J, PENG P W H, LAM K, et al. Anatomical study of the innervation of anterior knee joint capsule:implication for image-guided intervention[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med,2018, 43(4):407-414.

[19]TAN Y L, NEO E J R, WEE T C. Ultrasound-guided genicular nerve blockade with pharmacological agents for chronic knee osteoarthritis:a systematic review[J]. Pain Physician,2022, 25(4):E489-E502.

[20]CHEN A F, MULLEN K, CASAMBRE F, et al. Thermal nerve radiofrequency ablation for the nonsurgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis:a systematic literature review[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021, 29(9):387-396.

[21]CHEN B K, YANG Y, WANG H, et al. Is radiofrequency ablation effective in treating patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Med Surg, 2024, 86(1):412-420.

[22]ELAWAMY A, KAMEL E Z, MAHRAN S A, et al. Efficacy of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation versus intraarticular platelet rich plasma in chronic knee osteoarthritis:a single-blind randomized clinical trial[J]. Pain Physician, 2021, 24(2):127-134.

基本信息:

DOI:10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2025.06.005

中图分类号:R684.3

引用信息:

[1]黄炎,罗克清,张金科,等.超声引导下单极与双极射频热凝治疗中重度膝骨关节炎的效果对比[J].南通大学学报(医学版),2025,45(06):534-539.DOI:10.16424/j.cnki.cn32-1807/r.2025.06.005.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(82471249); 江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20211107)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文